This new feature in Xert where the workout can just be “filling the correct bucket and then going home” brought up this time honored question for me again.
A simple way to ask the question is “is time in zone all that matters for an effective workout, or does it matter how we achieve that time in zone?”
For example, is there evidence in trained cyclists that 1x30 is more effective than 3x10?
And I’ve always assumed that the 10 minute intervals needed to be done at 10 minute power, while the 30 minute interval would be done at (lower) 30 minute power. But again, is there evidence that is required?
I do the vast majority of my training outdoors and really enjoy that. I typically do structured interval workouts to hit the various energy systems. So it is very interesting to me that I might be able to just go for a ride and push hard on the hills (if it’s an intensity workout) or ride long (if it’s an endurance workout) and have the bucket app tell me when I’ve achieved the goal of the workout.
Thought?
Evidence-based studies supporting one or the other perspectives?
Thanks Peter